Congress is seeking to pass a Constitutional Amendment limiting contributions to election campaigns

Not without my having a hissy-fit about it, they aren’t.

The Senate, primarily Democrats (but it says “Joint,” so to me that implies at least one sponsor from the Republicans) has introduced Senate Joint Resolution 19, found here: “Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections.”

Now yeah, the US elections process has tons of bullshit within it. The Electoral College is an idiotic structure and campaign financing is a mess. My hope was this particular bill would curtail spending by corporations for electoral campaigns. Corporations aren’t people, and in my opinion don’t have freedom of speech. Individuals should be allowed to contribute whatever they want to an election, as long as it’s in a free and open manner (hey, if you want to use your free speech to support someone, then be accountable for it). Oh, and to close a loophole, no one should be permitted to contribute to a campaign on behalf of another person (so those corporations can’t donate $10 billion dollars on behalf of all their employees).

Anyway, just my two cents. There’s still plenty of room for corruption and influence there, but hey, Democracy is the worst form of government in the world, except for all the others, right (and there are, imho, a couple of exceptions to this rule, but that’s another blog entry)? Unfortunately, this bill – which remember is really a Constitutional Amendment – accomplishes absolutely none of that, and instead seeks to curtail your First Amendment rights.

It’s rather brief and to the point, but absolutely vague enough to let Congress unleash absolute power over your rights via subsequent bills supported by this legislation. To boil the roughly seven parts down to a couple of sentences: Congress shall have power to regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to Federal and State elections by setting limits on the amount of contributions to candidates for the purposes of supporting or opposing a candidate. Oh, they do point out this amendment will have no power over freedom of the press, just individuals because, you know, the press is more important. And then the kicker that’s going to screw all of us: “Section 4. Congress and the States shall have power to implement and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”

Now all this is the potential impact. What’s probably the real impact? Somehow I don’t think this is going to get through Congress. If it did, three-fourths of the states would have to ratify it, which I also don’t think will happen. And I have a feeling the Supreme Court would strike it down as well.

But do we really want to take that chance?


About stoshk

Career military member, and for many years a registered Independent. I'm not a particularly type-A personality, and believe people can disagree on a topic while still being respectful of each other's opinion - everything doesn't have to be a "you're either with me or against me" philosophy. I DON'T believe everything is black or white, I DO believe most rules have exceptions, and most situations have to be judged on their own merit rather than following a blanket "party line." I DO believe that while elected officials do represent their districts and constituents, they also have an obligation to act for the greater good of the nation as a whole, and leadership should be by example, not a "do as I say, not as I do" philosophy. I started this blog because I've reached a point where I feel many aspects of local, regional, national and global life are just plain disgusting me and I needed someplace to vent, and I've had enough positive feedback about the letters, notes and commentary on various subjects that I've posted to friends through email and/or social media that I thought this might be worth it - at least to me. Any and all comments, writings and postings in the blog are solely my opinion and absolutely do not represent the views of the U.S. Government and/or the Department of Defense.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s